All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Lists Linaro-dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:34:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED79E9F.7060103@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201145801.GB2103@sirena.org.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/01/2011 03:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:51:00PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
>> commit 549158d2ab01e8370d2773044fe09738a26f7086
>> Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
>> Date:   Thu Aug 25 00:35:59 2011 -0400
> 
>>     ARM: move iotable mappings within the vmalloc region
>>    
>>     In order to remove the build time variation between different SOCs
>> with
>>     regards to VMALLOC_END, the iotable mappings are now allocated inside
>>     the vmalloc region.  This allows for VMALLOC_END to be identical
>> across
>>     all machines.
> 
> I recently reported an issue with this patch on s3c64xx which I'm
> avoiding with the below change, I believe Nicolas folded this in to his
> code but it's not propagated into -next yet.
> 
> From d53e2ce3fb18e097678b324932591044eb80c0f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:46:04 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Handle empty maps in iotable_init()
> 
> Some CPUs (such as the S3C6410) have been relying on being able to call
> iotable_init() with no io_descs in order to simplify passing through
> machine-specific io_descs. The changes in "ARM: move iotable mappings
> within the vmalloc region" broke this by adding an early_alloc_aligned()
> for an array of vm_structs. Fix this by returning early if no descriptors
> have been passed.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is the most tasteful fix but it preserves existing
> behaviour and allows boot to proceed on my system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 06e2aef..94c5a0c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -763,6 +763,9 @@ void __init iotable_init(struct map_desc *io_desc, int nr)
>  	struct map_desc *md;
>  	struct vm_struct *vm;
>  
> +	if (!nr)
> +		return;
> +
>  	vm = early_alloc_aligned(sizeof(*vm) * nr, __alignof__(*vm));
>  
>  	for (md = io_desc; nr; md++, nr--) {

Thanks for the patch Mark. I applied it and tried to boot but the kernel
is still stuck on the same place :(


- -- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO156fAAoJEAKBbMCpUGYAZK4H/iCGIqc7pYPllJbO4b4JU6FB
iTIXCeNrLZIxoqgugTQTru/6ISX/Rc3jjXIXrmu7NRjN5V+C0IzpJzRj5x4X/ysJ
xOU+65pKZ2z9D+BnkXADKYZCM6Zlqnf4qtMFLGHC1Ki1QK6HwMmReYUDEJc/7V3z
b1jXlql88Lgex9iFo73VKHn+ww8E/8OWyeutyTUIw9kvrlVaXQy6mF87rOPtS3gP
HCENMMwtEKUlHPrVBDA/MRQDF0iWKQl0aDKlmJBL3HivoAVlmhr1H6m260dkWo1w
dQUfTG7XbBWN3xg2JQ9Bp2KpTl4VvCyEJl9k0ymlcim00+l+dQySpaeC+LCKkG0=
=x1Qh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01 14:51 linux-next not booting on snowball Daniel Lezcano
     [not found] ` <4ED79454.1090304-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-01 14:58   ` Mark Brown
2011-12-01 15:34     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2011-12-01 19:03       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-01 23:06         ` Daniel Lezcano
2011-12-02  0:11           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-02 17:31             ` Daniel Lezcano
2011-12-07  4:09               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-13 12:35                 ` Linus Walleij
2011-12-14  8:24                   ` Linus Walleij
2011-12-14  8:27                     ` Mark Brown
2011-12-14  8:38                       ` Linus Walleij
2011-12-12 15:41               ` Daniel Lezcano
2011-12-12 16:56                 ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ED79E9F.7060103@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.