From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: bjschuma@netapp.com
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] NFS: Modularize NFS v3
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:05:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED7EBFF.6030706@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322758102-29260-1-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com>
On 12/01/2011 11:48 AM, bjschuma@netapp.com wrote:
> From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
>
> This set of patches removes NFS v3 from the main NFS kernel module and creates
> a new module containing the proc, xdr, and acl code. This will give us a
> single directory to put NFS v3 specific code so it doesn't need to be mixed in
> with the generic client stuff.
>
> I'm sure this could still use a lot of work, but I figured I would wait to see
> what everybody thinks first. I imagine that once we get an "nfs submodule"
> system working it'll be easier to convert v2 and v4 (and possibly v4.1?) to
> modules.
>
> I split the second patch into two to make it easier to see what my changes were
> to get everything to compile. Hopefully this will save some pain in having to
> look through 7000+ line patch that resulted from my `mv nfs3*.c nfs3/`
> command. I can combine everything in a future version of the patch.
>
> v2:
> - I set the "diff.renames copy" git config option to create a smaller second
> patch. Maybe this time it won't get me kicked off the mailing list...
> Thanks to Boaz and Jim for the tip!
>
> Thoughts?
Now what is the motivating reason behind this re-architecture
other than making the upstream kernel literally impossible to
back port to older kernels??
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 16:48 [RFC 0/4] NFS: Modularize NFS v3 bjschuma
2011-12-01 16:48 ` [RFC v2 1/4] NFS: Export symbols needed by an NFS v3 module bjschuma
2011-12-01 16:48 ` [RFC v2 2/4] NFS: Move the NFS v3 code into its own subdirectory bjschuma
2011-12-01 16:48 ` [RFC v2 3/4] NFS: Add functions for adding new NFS versions bjschuma
2011-12-01 16:48 ` [RFC v2 4/4] NFS: Turn NFS v3 into a module bjschuma
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [RFC 0/4] NFS: Modularize NFS v3 Jim Rees
2011-12-01 19:56 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-12-01 21:05 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2011-12-01 21:55 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-12-01 21:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-12-02 2:38 ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-02 2:01 ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-02 16:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-10 17:42 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-10 17:58 ` Bryan Schumaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-22 22:57 bjschuma
2011-11-23 2:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-23 2:41 ` Jim Rees
2011-11-28 14:14 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-11-23 18:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED7EBFF.6030706@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.