From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RWGNC-0007Gy-Mr for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:49:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 14462 invoked by uid 1003); 1 Dec 2011 23:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.43.128?) (philip@opensdr.com@32.149.50.180) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Dec 2011 23:42:19 -0000 Message-ID: <4ED810D7.1040204@balister.org> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:42:15 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <48bd68cce53c87c7f9296a0a0ad5286efef7d5cc.1322594901.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> <1322598026.3077.11.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94E3D9E7EE@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1322604347.3077.18.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94E3D9E9B9@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1322758679.26081.242.camel@phil-desktop> <1322759839.17484.141.camel@ted> <1791C583-61A2-4087-8250-255FA25DAB22@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <1791C583-61A2-4087-8250-255FA25DAB22@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gmp: also generate the libgmpcxx library & package it properly X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:49:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/01/2011 12:26 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 dec. 2011, om 18:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 16:57 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:51 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: >>>> Thank you for the explanation. BTW where can I find official rules about signed-off-by line >>> >>> The "Signed-off-by" idiom originated with the kernel people and >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the linux source tree contains a >>> fairly good description of what it means to them. >>> >>> I'm not sure that there are any official rules about its use in OE apart >>> from what's in the Commit Patch Message Guidelines (see the wiki). >> >> The yocto docs do mention what the specific meaning of the line is. > > But this is oe-core.. Shall we all agree it's the same for OE-core as well? Yes. No sense having the same phrases mean different things in different layers. Philip > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core