From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: virtio_scsi: SCSI host lock push-down Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:54:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED94917.5050300@linutronix.de> References: <1322860424-21640-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1322862236.23492.10.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1322862343.25673.0.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:49389 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755793Ab1LBVyf (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:54:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1322862343.25673.0.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , "James E.J. Bottomley" On 12/02/2011 10:45 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:43 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >> Both of these are already running in 'hock_lock-less' mode as they >> should be, and there is no reason why it should be using DEF_SCSI_QCMD() >> in order to revert to holding hock_lock. > > Or host_lock even.. Thanks for clarifying. > --nab Sebastian