All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary?
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:51:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDA5387.5070103@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDA0650.9080702@afaics.de>



On 12/03/2011 06:21 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> several NFSv4-HOWTOs in the net require to export a root directory
> with fsid=0 first. Other exported directory trees should be nested
> within this root directory and exported with nohide. AFAIU the advan-
> tage of the root dir is that the client can mount "server:/somedir"
> instead of "server:/remote_mount_point/somedir".
> 
> Question: Is the common root directory optional? Since NFSv3 doesn't
> support this name space feature, wouldn't it be more wise to omit
> the root directory?
No, the fsid=0 export option is no longer necessary to make v4
exports compatible with v2/v3 exports. When the fsid option
is not set, the default root is define as "/" which allows
the v4 clients to mount the same exports as does the v2/v3 clients.

Now if you do not what "/" as your default root, you can
set fsid to something like fsid=/export. This will
change to default root to the /export directory which
means your v4 clients will only be able to access exports
under the /export directory. 

I believe the Linux server is the only server to have
this option...

steved.

> 
> 
> Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated
> 
> Harri
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk7aBlAACgkQUTlbRTxpHjeO0wCggdEdfcBzswibHAOG6w2xJa5r
> B4QAn3MsYZR7xCh60c1X4AsNLnutXSPI
> =nEBr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-03 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-03 11:21 NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary? Harald Dunkel
2011-12-03 13:56 ` Jim Rees
2011-12-03 16:51 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2011-12-06  1:10   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-07 16:30     ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-07 16:32       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-07 21:17         ` Steve Dickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDA5387.5070103@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=harri@afaics.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.