From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXYw7-00010Y-IM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:50:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXYw0-0002vd-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:50:27 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:41437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXYw0-0002p5-FP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:50:20 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:49:56 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id pB5Dnq8a116152 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:49:52 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id pB5DnqrI003392 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:49:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4EDCCBFF.5000805@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:49:51 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4ED7F059.8040408@us.ibm.com> <20111205105129.GB2734@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20111205105129.GB2734@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 1.0 release List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: qemu-devel On 12/05/2011 04:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:23:37PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of >> QEMU 1.0! > > Great to see the release out now. > > Could you clarify the intention for release numbering from this > point onwards. Is it correct to say that subsequent feature releases > will be 1.x and that the 3-digit version numbers (1.0.x, 1.1.x, etc) > will be reserved for possible stable release branches ? The dev branch is going to move to 1.0.50 and we'll continue with that version style. Note that this release is technically 1.0.0 and QMP reports it as such. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Regards, > Daniel