Hi, as you may know (we may have met at Bake-A-Thon), I am working on NFS-Ganesha, a NFS server running in userspace. I currently face an issue when running cthon04 test suite, during the "lock step". Client is linux 3.1.0-rc4, server is nfs-ganesha compiled with FSAL_VFS support. Server is mounted via command "mount -overs=4.minorversion=1,lock : /mnt" During the test#2 in "lock" tests, I got the following error: Creating parent/child synchronization pipes. Test #2 - Try to lock the whole file. Parent: 2.0 - F_TLOCK [ 0, ENDING] FAILED! Parent: **** Expected success, returned errno=37... Parent: **** Probably implementation error. ** PARENT pass 1 results: 0/0 pass, 0/0 warn, 1/1 fail (pass/total). ** CHILD pass 1 results: 0/0 pass, 0/0 warn, 0/0 fail (pass/total). I made a wireshark capture of the packet (see attachement). Apparently, the client does 2 compounds, one for OP4_OPEN and a second to call OP4_OPEN_CONFIRM. On the client side, the "locl/locklfs" binary fails when calling lockf() (this is not the first time it calls it, it has been done in test#1 which passed successfully). Error return is ENOLCK (posix error #37). I enabled the kernel's debug message by using the command 'echo 32767 > /proc/sys/sunrpc/nfs_debug' (complete log in attachement, reduced to what is related to lock#2). Grepping 'NFS' in this shows this: Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: nfs_update_inode(0:16/523265 ct=2 info=0x27e7f) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: permission(0:16/523265), mask=0x1, res=0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: nfs_lookup_revalidate(/rep) is valid Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: nfs_update_inode(0:16/544895 ct=1 info=0x27e7f) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: permission(0:16/544895), mask=0x1, res=0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: permission(0:16/544895), mask=0x1, res=0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: atomic_lookup(0:16/544895), lockfile2908 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: decode_attr_pnfstype: bitmap is 0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: nfs4_schedule_state_renewal: requeueing work. Lease period = 80 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: --> nfs_put_client({2}) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: <-- nfs4_setup_sequence status=0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: nfs_update_inode(0:16/544895 ct=1 info=0x27e67) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: change_attr change on server for file 0:16/544895 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: mtime change on server for file 0:16/544895 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: nfs_fhget(0:16/544930 ct=1) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: open file(rep/lockfile2908) Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: permission(0:16/544930), mask=0x26, res=0 Dec 5 13:31:08 aury63 kernel: NFS: lock(rep/lockfile2908, t=1, fl=1, r=0:9223372036854775807) I can see no reason why ENOLCK is returned. This is clearly a bug on the server handside (within nfs-ganesha) but I have to know what the client is doing here to have a clearer idea. I ran the same test using NFSv4.1 and NFSv3+NLMv4, things go perfectly OK with no failure. Can someone help me ? Regards Philippe