From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:56:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDCF7DA.1050306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321289454-9219-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Am 14.11.2011 17:50, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> After the coroutinization of the block layer, immediate failures
> of an AIO operation will still return an AIOCB and only report
> failure with a bottom half. This lets us remove a lot of dead
> NULL checks (patches 1-5).
>
> Patch 6 is on a similar theme, but a bit different.
>
> Most "added" lines are actually just reindented.
>
> Paolo Bonzini (6):
> block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL
> block: simplify failure handling for bdrv_aio_multiwrite
> block: qemu_aio_get does not return NULL
> dma: the passed io_func does not return NULL
> block: dma_bdrv_* does not return NULL
> block: avoid useless checks on acb->bh
Thanks, applied all to the block branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 16:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 1/6] block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 2/6] block: simplify failure handling for bdrv_aio_multiwrite Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 3/6] block: qemu_aio_get does not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 4/6] dma: the passed io_func " Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 5/6] block: dma_bdrv_* " Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 6/6] block: avoid useless checks on acb->bh Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-30 8:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 v2] block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-30 8:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-05 16:56 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDCF7DA.1050306@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.