From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:55:51 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] I have broken out a large section of Fedora policy
 into the new format.
In-Reply-To: <4EDCCDC6.40301@tresys.com>
References: <4ED7B52D.3050703@redhat.com> <4EDCCDC6.40301@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <4EDD13B7.9040506@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/05/2011 08:57 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 12/01/11 12:11, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> I have gotten a lot of fedora contrib policy to compile against
>> the latest refpolicy (base).  Now the question is how do we go
>> about getting the contrib policy merged into refpolicy.
>> 
>> Once we have done a good portion of this, we can start looking
>> at merging in more of the changes between current fedora policy
>> base and refpolicy base.
> 
> You can commit it.  If you're worried about it showing up too soon
> in the base repo, the revision of contrib is pinned in the base
> repo, so it won't show up in the checkouts of the full repo unless
> you go into contrib and pull HEAD.
> 
> Alternatively, we get get an ACK on them before you commit it.
> 
I have no problem checking any of these in, although i would like to
get someone to at least ack the change.  Also some of the patches
included changes to upstream, either missing interfaces or additional
port definitions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7dE7cACgkQrlYvE4MpobNBowCfcQJCitBYrrE3BDdiwD7a8BVq
gb4An3uwynX+sjoDbk/5cj5P1YYT3OeS
=q/Yy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----