From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:13:41 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] Fix fence-agents manpages In-Reply-To: References: <4EDE1C0D.3080209@fabbione.net> Message-ID: <4EDE3125.2070501@fabbione.net> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/6/2011 4:05 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > 2011/12/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto : >> On 12/6/2011 2:27 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: >>> Hi Cluster-devel list, >>> >>> You will find attached a patch originating from Ubuntu (Andres >>> Rodriguez), that fixes a few issues in manpages (namely fence_drac and >>> fence_scsi). >> >> >> I wonder why the ubuntu/canonical maintainers can?t post patches >> directly for upstream inclusion. > > they obviously can Fabio. > But I proposed to do this on my side, since I still have some things > to do around fence_eaton... > That way, they can focus on other things. > > After all, it's just posting an email. The actual and important work > is to catch bugs and fix this ;-) > >>> Please consider applying it. >>> >>> As a side note, you may want to consider Asciidoc [1] to handle >>> generation of manpages, in groff and html format. >>> This already takes care of the groff formating, and would avoid the >>> above kind of issues. >>> That said, iirc you're also doing some POD style extraction, so it may >>> not be fully relevant. >> >> goal is to have all manpages generated at build time via fence_agent -o >> metadata output. Most of patches already exists for those few agents >> that don?t it. > > ok, that confirms the "POD" style approach. > I wasn't sure if you were standardizing on this, or going away from. The patch will be "obsoleted" in the fence-agents release or max two. Fabio