From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] Add scan demux unit and use it in max1363
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:39:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDE3738.70704@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323121036-21094-1-git-send-email-jic23@kernel.org>
Hi Jonathan,
I can't seem to find a proper way to apply this patchset. On what
patchset is it based ?
I'm still here with what seems to be a rather old version of your tree
(3413ec), but it is still the head of your git tree on kernel.org.
Thanks,
Maxime
On 05/12/2011 22:37, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> The v3 here is just to indicate a tiny change suggested by
> Lars-Peter from the version that has been out for review on
> linux-iio. (Using ALIGN instead of hand rolling in one case
> in patch 4). Anyhow, not worth putting out for another review
> as Lars-Peter has tested and acked without it anyway.
>
> Technically Lars-Peter only acked patches 4 and 5 but they
> are the important ones (the others being trivial or tied
> up with the max1363 driver which is one of mine..)
>
> This set introduces the an optional demultiplexer into the
> path of data form devices to buffers. It is a necessary step
> on the path to in kernel push interfaces (trigger driven ones).
> Also rather useful on it's own as shown by the max1363 patches
> and some uses Lars-Peter has made of it in another series.
>
> Anyhow fair bit more to come so time to send these on to you!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> v2 text:
> Hi All,
>
> New version of this series. Two changes as per Lars-Peter's
> suggestions. ALIGN macro usage in patch 4 and one of the two
> for each bit set suggestions. The second is subtly different
> as it is finding bits after a certain point rather than from
> the start.
>
> As explained in patch 5 discussion, I personally feel that
> the demux should occur prior to the buffer and avoiding the
> extra copy should be done by allowing buffers to provide
> callbacks for reserving (plus getting access to) space and
> notifying that they are done filling it. Either way, now
> is not the time to do this change. Too much else going on!
>
> v1 text:
> The last patch technically is a simple bug fix, but included here as
> it came up during testing of this series.
>
> The 'interesting' bits are the rewrite of iio_sw_buffer_preenable. I'd like
> people with drivers currently using that function to test and see what
> I have broken. We should also be able to drop a number of cases in specific
> drivers in favour of this version.
>
> The demux unit is designed to offer a straight path with little or no
> overhead if the client (here still the IIO buffer) needs all the data and to
> only get in the way when a subset of the active scan mask is requested.
>
> I may well have messed this up so please please test this set.
>
>
> Jonathan Cameron (7):
> staging:iio:find iio channel from scan index util function
> staging:iio:buffer add a cache of the timestamp scan index.
> staging:iio: add hook to allow core to perform scan related config.
> staging:iio: make iio_sw_buffer_preenable much more general.
> staging:iio: add demux optionally to path from device to buffer
> staging:iio:adc:max1363 use new demuxing support.
> staging:iio:adc:max1363 correctly set channels as big endian.
>
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/max1363.h | 11 ++-
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/max1363_core.c | 18 ++-
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/max1363_ring.c | 51 ++-----
> drivers/staging/iio/buffer.h | 16 ++
> drivers/staging/iio/iio.h | 13 ++-
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 212 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c | 11 ++
> 7 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 21:37 [PATCH V3 0/7] Add scan demux unit and use it in max1363 Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] staging:iio:find iio channel from scan index util function Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] staging:iio:buffer add a cache of the timestamp scan index Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] staging:iio: add hook to allow core to perform scan related config Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 4/7] staging:iio: make iio_sw_buffer_preenable much more general Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 5/7] staging:iio: add demux optionally to path from device to buffer Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-05 21:37 ` [PATCH 7/7] staging:iio:adc:max1363 correctly set channels as big endian Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-06 15:39 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2011-12-06 15:51 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] Add scan demux unit and use it in max1363 Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-06 17:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-06 20:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-07 10:39 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDE3738.70704@free-electrons.com \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.