From: Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:30:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF1631.5090906@pcharlan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vbormn8vk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 12/05/2011 10:58 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com> writes:
>
>> But this only works if there's a base version; if foo.c was added in
>> each branch, we get:
>>
>> error: path 'foo.c' does not have all three versions
>>
>> Git didn't need all three versions to create the original conflicted
>> file, so why would it need them to recreate it?
>
> Because the original "merge" was a bit more carefully written but
> "checkout -m" was written without worrying too much about "both sides
> added differently" corner case and still being defensive about not doing
> random thing upon getting an unexpected input state.
>
> IOW, being lazy ;-)
>
> How does this look?
Wow, thanks for the quick response! That does indeed let me checkout
the file as expected.
I wrote a test (below) to be folded in with your patch, but the test
fails because it expects the restored file to be the same as the
originally-conflicted file, but the conflict-line labels change from
"HEAD" and "master":
<<<<<<< HEAD
in_topic
=======
in_master
>>>>>>> master
to "ours" and "theirs". (The same thing happens in the 3-way merge
case.)
If the label change is expected then I can rewrite the test to ignore
labels, or to expect "ours" and "theirs", whichever you think is best.
If the label change is unexpected, then I guess the test is good :)
--Pete
-- >8 --
Test 'checkout -m -- path' when path is a 2-way merge
Signed-off-by: Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com>
---
t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
diff --git a/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh b/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..5b50360
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='checkout -m -- conflicted/path/with/2-way/merge
+
+Ensures that checkout -m on a resolved file restores the conflicted file
+when it conflicted with a 2-way merge.'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+ test_tick &&
+ test_commit initial_commit &&
+ git branch topic &&
+ test_commit added_in_master file.txt in_master &&
+ git checkout topic &&
+ test_commit added_in_topic file.txt in_topic
+'
+
+test_must_fail git merge master
+
+test_expect_success '-m restores 2-way conflicted+resolved file' '
+ cp file.txt file.txt.conflicted &&
+ echo resolved >file.txt &&
+ git add file.txt &&
+ git checkout -m -- file.txt &&
+ test_cmp file.txt.conflicted file.txt
+'
+
+test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-04 22:31 [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version Pete Harlan
2011-12-05 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 7:30 ` Pete Harlan [this message]
2011-12-08 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-12 1:48 ` Pete Harlan
2011-12-12 5:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-20 20:37 ` [PATCH] t/t2023-checkout-m.sh: fix use of test_must_fail Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-12-20 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-14 10:19 ` [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version Michael Schubert
2011-12-14 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-15 4:20 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-15 10:11 ` Michael Schubert
2011-12-15 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-15 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-16 22:38 ` Ramsay Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDF1631.5090906@pcharlan.com \
--to=pgit@pcharlan.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.