From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Anders Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] omap: id: add chip id recognition for omap4430 es2.3 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:26:15 -0600 Message-ID: <4EE00427.2000206@ti.com> References: <1323302492-20211-1-git-send-email-x0132446@ti.com> <20111208002342.GW31337@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:45347 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756743Ab1LHA0T (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:26:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111208002342.GW31337@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: danders.dev@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, aneesh@ti.com, jayabharath@ti.com Tony, On 12/07/2011 06:23 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * David Anders [111207 15:29]: > >> allow for the omap4430 es2.3 revision to be recognized in the >> omap4_check_revision() function. >> >> most aspects of all omap4430 es2.x versions are identical, however >> a number of small variations such as default pullup or pulldown >> resistor configurations vary between revisions. >> >> detailed information on silicon errata for omap4430 revisions can >> be found at http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/swpz009D.pdf >> > I have the earlier one already applied, this seems to be the > exact same patch, right? > > same core patch, with a break; added to the case 4. if you would rather i can provide a one line fix patch > Tony > Dave