From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757139Ab1LHAqN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:46:13 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53685 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756745Ab1LHAqM (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:46:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE008C6.70209@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:45:58 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart CC: "lkml, " , Matt Fleming , Edgar Hucek Subject: Re: EFI Framebuffer Documentation References: <4EDFF88F.7090802@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4EDFF88F.7090802@linux.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/2011 03:36 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > Documentation/fb/efifb.txt states that "efifb is only for EFI booted > Intel Macs." I took this to mean that CONFIG_FB_EFI may also only be for > Intel Macs. Turns out I need CONFIG_FB_EFI for video console output on > my Atom EFI booted development boards. > > Does this mean efifb.txt needs to be updated, or are the two actually > referring to different things? It needs update, I believe. -hpa