From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6943DE0054C for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 3734 invoked by uid 1003); 9 Dec 2011 16:37:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.104?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.172.5) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Dec 2011 16:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4EE2392A.1040302@balister.org> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:36:58 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <1323431474.5309.128.camel@ted> <1323447637.5309.180.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1323447637.5309.180.camel@ted> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: meta-oe branch for edison? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:37:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? >>> >>> This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be >>> the reason for the repository? >>> >>>> I'd like to also >>>> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo >>>> for specific Yocto releases. >>>> >>>> (I can add that in my investigation so far - >>>> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting >>>> commit for edison) >>> >>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more >>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch >>> name that is edison in the poky repo. >> >> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want >> a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. >> I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will >> attempt similar things. > > I think it should be fine to add an appropriate branch to the meta-oe > repository itself. We should probably have this discussion on the oe list. Basically, we should have a way to create a "stable" branch for oe-core and meta-oe. There also needs to be some "policy" in place for commits. The primary concern is making sure the development branches get all needed fixes that go into the branches. Philip