From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754655Ab1LITsD (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:48:03 -0500 Received: from che.mayfirst.org ([209.234.253.108]:48242 "EHLO che.mayfirst.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753566Ab1LITsB (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:48:01 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 372 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:48:01 EST Message-ID: <4EE26486.8090904@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:41:58 -0500 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Howells CC: Arjan van de Ven , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [GIT PULL] Crypto keys and module signing References: <4EE250E0.6090104@linux.intel.com> <28442.1323269262@redhat.com> <2409.1323422253@redhat.com> <4EE2191E.8070107@linux.intel.com> <11634.1323454017@redhat.com> <2762.1323456423@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2762.1323456423@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBA632495E12069A1A2E96895" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBA632495E12069A1A2E96895 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/09/2011 01:47 PM, David Howells wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: >=20 >> ... the temp key can use /dev/urandom. >> seriously, /dev/urandom for one time, temp keys is not bad >> (if you care about the difference, you better provide your own real ke= y) >=20 > Can you tell gpg which random device to use? Depending on the version of gpg, supplying either --quick-random or --debug-quick-random should use a cheaper PRNG. I think this is an undocumented feature, though. hth, --dkg --------------enigBA632495E12069A1A2E96895 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJO4mSGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpRdEP/1ZZj6eYDxUxN5et8YtWeUav cTU3JIXc+Gf+1SzBgeS9wnpzgIhctoPo6CzxDHm847IWyl8dn4CnqxeSgYs7N7jB vGYVHb0oqKL3jj6So2bEF1yzgVB8aAoWTc8Mdf+gkvadMxLUmhlL/GwL8CnbkkgN wq96PVPd+COgO2apzDz3t18yQb1+z7tQ4aA7jKuk7p6/kkGj8ITfr75qcks5jhel q6BY5FrAOh+3RbRdLLUe+mcLtHfi3PTof0wTrQbNJxjaRKop0NPfbYwcZ9O7eYOv gaZ2U2jvztxeNRqt1qzm7m9fmOiU6kHc94nx167ij3/vRaFF06VUAp/vpsyLfd+q atykIGepHxdJdK0NjPG3APZY6B8rmSJuHqAk4nOsrL3wiHtjzWESnhMWkmi5ENii 9GZkB5bwYV+5Ua7WRht5+ctA+HDN6x1WNn1D/kJ8kvPSMsgqqsKISsNvuWG24pf5 X8E9OUFh7fFrLnI5f1K55ciVDDLArXrI5YMz6hbOgREjhvzGp3/dTyIl6PEyg9+N n0ZY51j0zR2SfndAVNVaKd1WsK8sUyaMEgPuqi7WIpgmU/i2B7EraFHEOqRGh8bR 7LLO8pl0ggktc27r2lV6fFeop2Ew12Wh6difgBlplD/CVF+cenhOa2nkALEPja/H SO8l8Q0b5fDibmjElDQ+ =TPvt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBA632495E12069A1A2E96895--