From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flexcan: Acknowledge all interrupt sources in the IRQ handler
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:10:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE3BCB4.7060401@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE21C96.5010604@grandegger.com>
On 12/09/2011 03:35 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 02:59 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Marc Kleine-Budde writes:
>>> On 12/09/2011 02:47 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>>>> Otherwise the handler will get stuck in an endless IRQ loop when an
>>>> interrupt condition occurs that is not being acked (e.g. TWRN)
>>>
>>> On which CPU do you have this problem?
>>>
>> on i.MX28.
>
> Yes, it is definitely needed on i.MX28 and I already have it in my
> series. See:
>
> https://gitorious.org/~wgrandegger/linux-can/wg-linux-can-next/commit/8ad94fa0dd7f7728824fa8fd4479390ac3f189c7
>
> BTW: at similar patch was already sent by Reuben Dowle.
>
>>> Seems that mx25/35 behave a bit different than mx28. But I had no time
>>> to dig into this, yet. BTW Wolfgang is just reworking error handling,
>>> can you please test his patches he recently posted on linux-can.
>>>
>> The ESR of i.MX25 is completely identical to the i.MX28.
>> You should be able to reproduce the problem when trying to send a
>> message to a CAN interface with the transceiver disabled.
>> You will get a BIT0_ERR and the TWRN bit will be asserted and never
>> cleared leading to an endless interrupt loop.
>
> If you are right, the code was never working on i.MX25/35... which I doubt.
I know remember that the old code was working on a MX35PDK board.
Actually I did the porting some time ago. That means that we have to
deal with two variants of the Flexcan controller, unfortunately:
mx25/35: State changes *and* bus errors are both signalled via ESR ERR
bit. The TWRN, RWRN and BOFF bits seem not to be used. Therefore
bus error reporting cannot be enabled/disabled individually.
mx28/mx53?: Bus error are signalled via ESR ERR bit and state changes
via TWRN, RWRN and BOFF bit. Therefore bus error reporting
*can* be enabled/disabled individually as implemented by this
patch:
https://gitorious.org/~wgrandegger/linux-can/wg-linux-can-next/commit/f0829d269a451c8abb99435d5a1a63cb18566668
I will try to get a MX35PDK board for further evaluation and development.
Wolfgang.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-10 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 13:47 [PATCH] flexcan: Acknowledge all interrupt sources in the IRQ handler Lothar Waßmann
2011-12-09 13:52 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2011-12-09 13:59 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-12-09 14:35 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-12-10 20:10 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE3BCB4.7060401@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.