From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:53:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21012 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903717Ab1LLCw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:52:58 +0100 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBC2qmK9019456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:52:48 -0500 Received: from [10.67.4.31] (vpn1-4-31.sin2.redhat.com [10.67.4.31]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBC2qZ41006827; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE56C67.2060909@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:52:23 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" , Jiri Kosina , Kevin Cernekee , "Justin P. Mattock" , Peter Zijlstra , David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/62] mips: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic() References: <1322371662-26166-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1322371662-26166-5-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20111209160639.GA30988@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20111209160639.GA30988@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-archive-position: 32085 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: amwang@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8783 于 2011年12月10日 00:06, Ralf Baechle 写道: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:26:44PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > > Acked-by: Ralf Baechle > > I assume you want to merge this patch as part of a single series? > I put all the patches into a single tree which is in linux-next now. :) Thanks for review!