From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: Rename vm_list to kvm_list to avoid confusion Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:51:47 +0800 Message-ID: <4EE58863.5020102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20111212072242.8aaf64a3420608b8204702c7@gmail.com> <20111212072403.fa4040305e37c7cbb5f100ed@gmail.com> <4EE57222.7050402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EE57D67.80906@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa , avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.9]:58577 "EHLO e28smtp09.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752197Ab1LLEv4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:51:56 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:21:53 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id pBC4poHC3322022 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:21:50 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id pBC4pnjV013523 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:21:49 +0530 In-Reply-To: <4EE57D67.80906@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/12/2011 12:04 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > (2011/12/12 12:16), Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> On 12/12/2011 06:24 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >> >>> From: Takuya Yoshikawa >>> >>> Make it clear that this is not related to virtual memory. >>> >> >> >> 'vm' means 'virtual machine'... > > Of course I know. So I wrote "not related" to virtual memory. > > What's your point? > In the code, we have kvm_create_vm()/kvm_destroy_vm(), then add/delete the 'vm" to/from the "vm_list", it is really clear, so i think this name is OK. :)