All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
	Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>,
	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_can: fix error passive level test
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:39:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE5CBBD.4050206@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE5C9F2.7050502@grandegger.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1112 bytes --]

On 12/12/2011 10:31 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 10:17 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 09:05 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2011 08:16 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
>>>> The test (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127) would always be false because
>>>> the receive error counter ((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) is at most 127, where
>>>> PCH_REC is defined as 0x7f00.  To test whether the receive error counter
>>>> has reached the error passive level, the RP bit (15) should be used.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>>
>> Is this patch a candidate for stable?
> 
> You mean for the "net" branch? Yes, I think so.

Even for all trees which contain this driver (in a working version),
which is v2.6.38 and newer.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-12  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-12  7:16 [PATCH] pch_can: fix error passive level test Xi Wang
2011-12-12  8:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-12-12  9:17   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2011-12-12  9:31     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-12-12  9:39       ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2011-12-12  9:50         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-01-07 23:47           ` Xi Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EE5CBBD.4050206@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    --cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.