From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com,
levinsasha928@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm tools, qcow: Add support for growing refcount blocks
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:15:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE5E24D.20300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112121257150.7537@tux.localdomain>
Am 12.12.2011 11:58, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> @@ -667,14 +722,11 @@ static struct qcow_refcount_block *qcow_read_refcount_block(struct qcow *q, u64
>>>
>>> rft_idx = clust_idx >> (header->cluster_bits - QCOW_REFCOUNT_BLOCK_SHIFT);
>>> if (rft_idx >= rft->rf_size)
>>> - return NULL;
>>> + return (void *)-ENOSPC;
>>
>> Is this allowed style in kvm-tool? :-/
>
> It needs to use ERR_PTR() and related macros but otherwise I don't see a
> big problem with it.
Can you be sure that it never clashes with a valid allocation when you
use this in userspace?
But yes, at least using appropriate functions should be required. And
this means that you can't only check for -ENOSPC, but you need to check
for all possible error codes (IS_ERR_VALUE() I guess).
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-12 2:03 [RFC PATCH] kvm tools, qcow: Add support for growing refcount blocks Lan Tianyu
2011-12-12 9:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-12 10:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-12 11:15 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2011-12-12 11:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-13 3:41 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 8:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-13 9:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-14 1:22 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 3:16 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 9:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-13 3:05 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 9:03 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE5E24D.20300@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.