From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.167]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUNV-0008A7-22 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:34:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 25640 invoked by uid 1003); 13 Dec 2011 15:21:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.104?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.172.5) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Dec 2011 15:21:12 -0000 Message-ID: <4EE76D67.5060404@balister.org> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:21:11 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1323707082-9185-1-git-send-email-philip@balister.org> <1323707082-9185-2-git-send-email-philip@balister.org> <4EE6492F.9030402@balister.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gvfs : Fix build failure due to introduction of host includes. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:34:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/12/2011 04:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Philip Balister wrote: >>>> >>>> EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-samba \ >>>> + --disable-archive \ >>> >>> You are disabling archive backend explicitly. It might be that someone is using >>> it successfully. Why does it not work ? >> >> With it enabled, the build fails because it looks at host includes. Long >> term someone will likely fix this, be in the short term, I need this to >> work so I can move forward with oe-core based stuff. > > OK. I see that we do not list libarchive in DEPENDS if we did then it > would build I suppose. Can you try that please ? > > so I think at present what you get is that if libarchive is built and > staged before you build > gvfs then you get the support compiled in if not then you don't. So > your patch at least makes > it consistent by disabling it. Still fails if you DEPEND on libarchive. Philip > > Problem only happens if you have libarchive-dev installed on your > build host which I think > you do have and hence you see the problem. > > I have no strong feeling on enabling or disabling it but I would > prefer consistency > > -Khem > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel