From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40854)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Alexey.Korolev@endace.com>) id 1RagVc-0000f1-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:32:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Alexey.Korolev@endace.com>) id 1RagVc-00041J-5s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:32:00 -0500
Received: from usrksweb02.endace.com ([174.143.168.194]:52205)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Alexey.Korolev@endace.com>) id 1RagVb-000415-Up
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:32:00 -0500
Message-ID: <4EE826A2.4090007@endace.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:31:30 +1300
From: Alexey Korolev <alexey.korolev@endace.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4ED58108.3090903@endace.com>
	<20111130074903.GD17781@redhat.com>	<4ED71582.3000107@endace.com>
	<20111201101718.GA8822@redhat.com>	<4EDC4690.1060604@endace.com>
	<20111205063151.GE22501@redhat.com>
	<4EDD98C0.6040808@endace.com> <4EE732E3.4020301@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE732E3.4020301@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [BUG] [Seabios] PCI 64bit BARs on
 Win2008 - unable to start the device. (ACPI lacks the _DSM method)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: sfd@endace.com, yamahata@valinux.co.jp, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>


>>> 2. Get a range toward the upper end of the memory, around 1<<40
>>>
>> Yes. This solution works great. And this is very simple as well. Just
>> wondering if it will be good as a complete solution?
> I would have tried this first too ;)
>
> Care to share the patches so we can review&  merge them?
No worries. Just need to complete and test the code and I'll post RFC 
patches shortly.