All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <4EE84B9A.90901@parallels.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d5362cb..7a167bb 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ On 12/14/2011 06:29 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
 >>> bool field just to indicate if the clone_children flag is set.
 >>> Make it a flag
 >>>
->>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
+>>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
 >>
 >> Doesn't this change how remount conditions are checked?
 >>
@@ -39,8 +39,3 @@ inherit clone_children from the parent - which is sane, IMHO. So this
 flag only has any value in establishing the initial behaviour of the top 
 root cgroup. I wonder then if it wouldn't better to just be explicit and 
 fail in this case ?
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
-the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index cb569dc..3105f11 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,18 +2,17 @@
  "ref\01323614738-7405-4-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com\0"
  "ref\020111213153921.GE25802@google.com\0"
  "ref\04EE80A0D.7090808@cn.fujitsu.com\0"
- "ref\04EE80A0D.7090808-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] make clone_children a flag\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:09:14 +0400\0"
- "To\0Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>"
-  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  jbottomley-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org
-  cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
-  devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
- " kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "To\0Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>"
+  <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  <jbottomley@parallels.com>
+  <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
+  <bsingharora@gmail.com>
+  <devel@openvz.org>
+ " <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 12/14/2011 06:29 AM, Li Zefan wrote:\n"
@@ -23,7 +22,7 @@
  ">>> bool field just to indicate if the clone_children flag is set.\n"
  ">>> Make it a flag\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ ">>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> Doesn't this change how remount conditions are checked?\n"
  ">>\n"
@@ -56,11 +55,6 @@
  "inherit clone_children from the parent - which is sane, IMHO. So this \n"
  "flag only has any value in establishing the initial behaviour of the top \n"
  "root cgroup. I wonder then if it wouldn't better to just be explicit and \n"
- "fail in this case ?\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe cgroups\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ fail in this case ?
 
-4625626dcc81f8a20ad931926d3dc0a768b437ee183abaa1f0e517d1afeb2c3d
+51863a1fb896238505e5ce6d8838e0834a2fd6e02633909c936c51c601866432

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.