From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denis Kuzmenko Subject: Re: [linux-next] make s5p64x0_defconfig build error Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4EE93185.9030502@solonet.org.ua> References: <1323838630.18517.1.camel@phoenix> <20111214123244.GE7122@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20111214191205.GF14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:52944 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755612Ab1LNXcN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:32:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111214191205.GF14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Will Deacon , Axel Lin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 12/14/2011 09:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:32:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:57:10AM +0000, Axel Lin wrote: > So... unless things change, we can expect Gemini, almost all Samsung > stuff, shmobile, vt8500, and Telechips TCC8k to be at least broken at > the next merge window. Mini2440 march (s3c24xx platform) is not broken in v3.2-rc5. Does that mean that s3c24xx is untouched by this issue or this means that I should use linux-next? If this problem is related to s3c24xx I'm ready to do my best for saving that platform from being removed. -- Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@solonet.org.ua (Denis Kuzmenko) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:30:13 +0200 Subject: [linux-next] make s5p64x0_defconfig build error In-Reply-To: <20111214191205.GF14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1323838630.18517.1.camel@phoenix> <20111214123244.GE7122@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20111214191205.GF14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4EE93185.9030502@solonet.org.ua> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/14/2011 09:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:32:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:57:10AM +0000, Axel Lin wrote: > So... unless things change, we can expect Gemini, almost all Samsung > stuff, shmobile, vt8500, and Telechips TCC8k to be at least broken at > the next merge window. Mini2440 march (s3c24xx platform) is not broken in v3.2-rc5. Does that mean that s3c24xx is untouched by this issue or this means that I should use linux-next? If this problem is related to s3c24xx I'm ready to do my best for saving that platform from being removed. -- Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko.