From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xenbus: Support HVM backends
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:13:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4EEA008E.5050002@citrix.com>
References: <1323893534-436-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
	<1323893534-436-2-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1323893534-436-2-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 14/12/11 20:12, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> Add HVM implementations of xenbus_(map,unmap)_ring_v(alloc,free) so
> that ring mappings can be done without using GNTMAP_contains_pte which
> is not supported on HVM.

Perhaps rename the functions to xenbus_map_ring() and
xenbus_unmap_ring()?  I wouldn't respin the series just for this though.

Is there merit in having the pv and hvm variants, instead of just the
hvm variant?

David