[refpolicy] [PATCH 1/1] Make role attributes able to type their "own" types.

[qingtao.cao@windriver.com (Harry Ciao)]

BTW, by using "seinfo --role=sysadm_r -x" command, we could get a full 
manifest of types that sysadm_r is able to type with. Below is the 
difference between without and with this fix. We sure want the sysadm_r 
able to type with newrole_t, useradd_t etc, don't we :-P

Thanks,
Harry

cao at cao-laptop:~/tmp/setools-3.3.7$ diff -up 
/home/cao/tmp/sysadm_r_types.wrong  /home/cao/tmp/sysadm_r_types.correct
--- /home/cao/tmp/sysadm_r_types.wrong    2011-12-16 14:24:21.000000000 
+0800
+++ /home/cao/tmp/sysadm_r_types.correct    2011-12-16 
14:23:32.000000000 +0800
@@ -56,12 +56,14 @@
           webalizer_t
           oav_update_t
           httpd_user_script_t
+         run_init_t
           smbmount_t
           spamassassin_t
           checkpc_t
           clockspeed_cli_t
           gpg_pinentry_t
           hwclock_t
+         newrole_t
           dcc_client_t
           mozilla_t
           traceroute_t
@@ -83,6 +85,7 @@
           portage_sandbox_t
           evolution_alarm_t
           qmail_queue_t
+         groupadd_t
           backup_t
           chkpwd_t
           depmod_t
@@ -93,6 +96,7 @@
           siggen_t
           updpwd_t
           apt_t
+         chfn_t
           gift_t
           giftd_t
           lpr_t
@@ -128,6 +132,7 @@
           lockdev_t
           mplayer_t
           sysadm_sudo_t
+         useradd_t
           twadmin_t
           twprint_t
           xserver_t
cao at cao-laptop:~/tmp/setools-3.3.7$




On 12/15/2011 03:17 PM, Harry Ciao wrote:
> By default, any role attribute should be able to type their "own" types
> that share the same prefix and used in the run interface. For example,
>
> role newrole_roles types newrole_t;
>
> so that the calling domain of the seutil_run_newrole() interface could
> properly tansition into newrole_t. Without above role rule, the caller's
> role won't be associated with newrole_t.
>
> Other role attributes such as useradd_roles, groupadd_roles, chfn_roles
> and run_init_roles should be fixed in the same way.
> ---
>   policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te   |    3 +++
>   policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te |    2 ++
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te b/policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te
> index 530c988..8fc8052 100644
> --- a/policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te
> +++ b/policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te
> @@ -6,9 +6,11 @@ policy_module(usermanage, 1.16.1)
>   #
>
>   attribute_role chfn_roles;
> +role chfn_roles types chfn_t;
>   role system_r types chfn_t;
>
>   attribute_role groupadd_roles;
> +role groupadd_roles types groupadd_t;
>
>   attribute_role passwd_roles;
>   roleattribute system_r passwd_roles;
> @@ -17,6 +19,7 @@ attribute_role sysadm_passwd_roles;
>   roleattribute system_r sysadm_passwd_roles;
>
>   attribute_role useradd_roles;
> +role useradd_roles types useradd_t;
>
>   type admin_passwd_exec_t;
>   files_type(admin_passwd_exec_t)
> diff --git a/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te b/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te
> index b3286c5..82268df 100644
> --- a/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te
> +++ b/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te
> @@ -13,8 +13,10 @@ attribute can_write_binary_policy;
>   attribute can_relabelto_binary_policy;
>
>   attribute_role newrole_roles;
> +role newrole_roles types newrole_t;
>
>   attribute_role run_init_roles;
> +role run_init_roles types run_init_t;
>   role system_r types run_init_t;
>
>   attribute_role semanage_roles;