All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug report: irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:02:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB0923.3000707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EEB0364.1060101@ladisch.de>

W dniu 16.12.2011 09:37, Clemens Ladisch pisze:
> Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 15.12.2011 18:49, Clemens Ladisch pisze:
>>> Was it the JMB38x that used a wrong interface number in its PCIe
>>> transactions, which would make the I/O-MMU map it to the wrong device?
>>> [...]
>>> add the kernel parameter intel_iommu=off to the boot loader.
>>
>> This did not work
> 
>> 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2
>>         Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0
>> 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 4
>>         Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0
>> ...
>> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: JMicron Technology Corp. JMC250 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 05)
>> 03:00.1 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. SD/MMC Host Controller (rev 90)
>> 03:00.2 SD Host controller: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host Controller (rev 90) (prog-if 01)
>> 03:00.3 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. MS Host Controller (rev 90)
>> 05:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): JMicron Technology Corp. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
> 
> Sorry, I didn't notice before that your FireWire controller is
> a physically separate chip on another PCIe port, so whatever is
> happening is unlikely to be related with another device.
> 
> It appears that the JMB381 is not correctly reinitialized when doing
> a suspend/resume.  However, the driver already does a reset of the chip,
> so it isn't clear what else could be done.  This might be a problem
> with the PCI initialization as done by the BIOS; try a BIOS update, if
> possible.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Clemens

I am already running the latest BIOS.
Is there a quirk list somewhere which would force irqpoll for certain
machines/drivers?

Julian

      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-15 14:30 bug report: irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 14:33 ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 15:56   ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-15 16:04     ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-15 17:49       ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-15 17:56         ` Julian Sikorski
2011-12-16  8:37           ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-16  9:02             ` Julian Sikorski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEB0923.3000707@gmail.com \
    --to=belegdol@gmail.com \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.