All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: UDEV-145??
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:21:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEBC476.20108@linux.intel.com> (raw)


Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around?  I 
know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages 
now using current kernels and udev?

Please let me know, I will remove it unless I hear otherwise.

Thanks
-- 
     Sau!

Saul Wold
Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
Yocto Project / Poky Build System




             reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-16 22:21 Saul Wold [this message]
2011-12-19 18:20 ` UDEV-145?? Joshua Lock
2011-12-20 13:35   ` UDEV-145?? Otavio Salvador
2011-12-20 13:48     ` UDEV-145?? Koen Kooi
2011-12-20 14:26       ` UDEV-145?? Otavio Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEBC476.20108@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.