From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] overo: add SPL support
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:20:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF07D72.4090906@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112201253.46991.schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
Hi Andreas,
On 12/20/11 13:53, Andreas M?ller wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:41:08 PM you wrote:
>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>
>> In message <CA+M6bXn_ZBqA8rosE4L4O+4Eu+grAhWgCZ=u=2Nomb6WcyL6-
> w at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>>> I guess you really, really must use i2c before relocation? =A0If
>>>> possible, this should be avoided in the first place.
>>>
>>> Yes, board rev detection to know how to configure SDRAM.
>>
>> I don't consider this a valid reason (reading the SPD EEPROM would be
>> such a reason). In almost all other cases it should be suffucient to
>> configure the maximum number of memory banks and the maximum size of
>> the memory banks and then use get_ram_size() to determine the actual
>> amount of memory and to correctly initialize the memory controller.
>>
>> Note that I don't insist on any changes to existing code here. This
>> is just a recommendation which you may (or may not) consider for any
>> future ports / implementations.
>>
>>
> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> I agree to your concerns but - as I understood Steve Sakoman - here the
> situation is slightly different:
> At elder overo boards TWL4030 RTC irq is connected to gpio112. Unfortunately
> this pin is also used for binary revision detection. Therefore we need to send
> 'shut-up' to TWL4030 via i2c to avoid reading wrong revision. In SPL this must
> be done *before* SDRAM (timing) is set up, because the type of SDRAM is
> revision dependent.
What about forging some very not optimized default DRAM settings,
that suit any assembled DRAM and then when you have I2C access,
reconfigure it - is it possible?
--
Regards,
Igor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 14:34 [U-Boot] [PATCH] overo: add SPL support Andreas Müller
2011-12-15 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-15 21:12 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 1:03 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 1:08 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-20 1:15 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 5:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 5:45 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-20 11:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 11:53 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 12:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 12:39 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 16:36 ` Aneesh V
2011-12-20 21:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 12:20 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2011-12-20 13:55 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-12-21 1:00 ` Andreas Müller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-14 16:27 Andreas Müller
2011-12-14 17:24 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-12-14 23:00 ` Andreas Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF07D72.4090906@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.