From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: Try harder to fix up broken headers
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:09:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4EF0EB78.4080406@redhat.com>
References: <1323300383-26917-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB89E7A7
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBKK9TKP008422
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:09:29 -0500
Received: from vapor.local (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])
	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id pBKK9SnJ021457
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:09:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1323300383-26917-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 12/7/11 6:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> There's no reason to force the first byte to be correct if we're already
> scoring how correct the header is.

Don't use this.  The 00 check is needed to make sure we only attempt the 
header fixup on the zeroth block (not extensions).

- ajax