From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4EF1231E.3070008@domain.hid>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:06:54 -0800
From: Bob Feretich <bob.feretich@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Xenomai-help] Support for OMAP-2.6.39?
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: Xenomai help <xenomai@xenomai.org>

With the Linux kernel change from 2.6 to 3.0, many device communities 
seem to be declaring "long term maintenance support" for the Linux 
2.6.39 kernel (supposedly the last of the 2.6 kernels). I have heard 
this from both the BeagleBoard and Overo communities. It seems logical 
that other communities will also do this to be able to advertise a "more 
stable 2.6 branch". BeagleBoard is targeting 2.6.39 to be a "validation 
suite" level.

Will Xenomai support OMAP-2.6.39?

Regards,
Bob Feretich