From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@fb.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] ABI for clock_gettime_ns
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:50:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF12D58.4000105@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1323739287.git.luto@amacapital.net>
On 12/12/11 5:26 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On x86-64, clock_gettime is so fast that the overhead converting to and
> from nanoseconds is non-negligible. clock_gettime_ns is a different
> interface that is potentially faster. If people like the ABI, I'll
> implement an optimized version.
Didn't see any major objections to this proposal.
Andy: will you be posting an optimized version?
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-13 1:26 [RFC 0/2] ABI for clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-13 1:26 ` [RFC 1/2] Add clock_gettime_ns syscall Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-13 3:32 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-13 1:26 ` [RFC 2/2] x86-64: Add __vdso_clock_gettime_ns vsyscall Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-13 3:24 ` [RFC 0/2] ABI for clock_gettime_ns Richard Cochran
2011-12-13 3:43 ` john stultz
2011-12-13 7:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-14 7:46 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-14 16:48 ` john stultz
2011-12-14 17:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-14 17:31 ` john stultz
2011-12-14 18:37 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-14 18:30 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-14 19:07 ` john stultz
2011-12-14 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-14 21:34 ` john stultz
2011-12-15 11:35 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-22 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-24 5:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-24 6:50 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-25 4:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-14 7:20 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-14 16:23 ` john stultz
2011-12-14 18:21 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-14 18:57 ` john stultz
2012-01-07 19:51 ` Richard Cochran
2011-12-21 0:50 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2011-12-21 1:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF12D58.4000105@fb.com \
--to=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kumar@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.