Hello Denis,

On 12/20/2011 05:32 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Yep, you're right I missed this in the original review.  Your proposed
> approach should work just fine, but I'd still prefer something without
> timeouts if possible.

OK.

> Another, third approach that might work is for the atom to keep track of
> any transactions in progress and cancel them when the refresh is
> detected.  They can then immediately re-initiate the new transaction
> without waiting.
>
> Regardless of which solution we pick, the trickiest part here is to make
> this automatic and easy for all the EFs that we read; and there are
> quite a bit of those.

Thanks for the ideas here! The third approach sounds good. Let me see how to fit it.

Regards,
Oleg
-- 
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled in Helsinki