From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4EF1A98D.9020101@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:40:29 +0100
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4EF1231E.3070008@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4EF1231E.3070008@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Support for OMAP-2.6.39?
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: Bob Feretich <bob.feretich@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai help <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On 12/21/2011 01:06 AM, Bob Feretich wrote:
> With the Linux kernel change from 2.6 to 3.0, many device communities 
> seem to be declaring "long term maintenance support" for the Linux 
> 2.6.39 kernel (supposedly the last of the 2.6 kernels). I have heard 
> this from both the BeagleBoard and Overo communities. It seems logical 
> that other communities will also do this to be able to advertise a "more 
> stable 2.6 branch". BeagleBoard is targeting 2.6.39 to be a "validation 
> suite" level.
> 
> Will Xenomai support OMAP-2.6.39?

The plan was to skip 2.6.39 and support 3.0. However, as already
proposed, if someone wants to provide this patch, we would be happy to
put it in a "contrib" directory, somewhere in Xenomai sources.

-- 
					    Gilles.