From: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: per.lkml@gmail.com,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: Kill block requests if card is removed
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:36:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF1BDA7.6070903@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE081CF.3010303@intel.com>
On 12/8/2011 2:52 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 08/12/11 10:35, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
>> Kill block requests when the host realizes that the card is
>> removed from the slot and is sure that subsequent requests
>> are bound to fail. Do this silently so that the block
>> layer doesn't output unnecessary error messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma<sthumma@codeaurora.org>
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>
Thanks Adrian.
Chris can you pull this patch with Adrian's ack?
Thanks,
Sujit
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Extra check to make sure no further commands are sent
>> in error case when the card is removed.
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Dropped dependency on Per's patch and is now dependent
>> on "[PATCH V4] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately
>> if a card has been removed" by Adrian Hunter.
>> - Modified commit text slightly as Adrian has
>> implemented his own suggestion in a different patch.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Changed the implementation with further comments from Adrian
>> - Set the card removed flag in bus notifier callbacks
>> - This patch is now dependent on patch from Per Forlin:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/11128/focus=11211
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> index 0c959c9..0cad48a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ enum mmc_blk_status {
>> MMC_BLK_ABORT,
>> MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
>> MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
>> + MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
>> };
>>
>> module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
>> @@ -639,6 +640,7 @@ static int get_card_status(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status, int retries)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +#define ERR_NOMEDIUM 3
>> #define ERR_RETRY 2
>> #define ERR_ABORT 1
>> #define ERR_CONTINUE 0
>> @@ -706,6 +708,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
>> u32 status, stop_status = 0;
>> int err, retry;
>>
>> + if (mmc_card_removed(card))
>> + return ERR_NOMEDIUM;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Try to get card status which indicates both the card state
>> * and why there was no response. If the first attempt fails,
>> @@ -722,8 +727,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
>> }
>>
>> /* We couldn't get a response from the card. Give up. */
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> + /* Check if the card is removed */
>> + if (mmc_detect_card_removed(card->host))
>> + return ERR_NOMEDIUM;
>> return ERR_ABORT;
>> + }
>>
>> /* Flag ECC errors */
>> if ((status& R1_CARD_ECC_FAILED) ||
>> @@ -996,6 +1005,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card *card,
>> return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
>> case ERR_ABORT:
>> return MMC_BLK_ABORT;
>> + case ERR_NOMEDIUM:
>> + return MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM;
>> case ERR_CONTINUE:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -1329,6 +1340,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>> if (!ret)
>> goto start_new_req;
>> break;
>> + case MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM:
>> + goto cmd_abort;
>> }
>>
>> if (ret) {
>> @@ -1345,6 +1358,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>>
>> cmd_abort:
>> spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
>> + if (mmc_card_removed(card))
>> + req->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
>> while (ret)
>> ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO, blk_rq_cur_bytes(req));
>> spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> index dcad59c..2517547 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>> */
>> static int mmc_prep_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>> {
>> + struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
>> +
>> /*
>> * We only like normal block requests and discards.
>> */
>> @@ -37,6 +39,9 @@ static int mmc_prep_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>> return BLKPREP_KILL;
>> }
>>
>> + if (mq&& mmc_card_removed(mq->card))
>> + return BLKPREP_KILL;
>> +
>> req->cmd_flags |= REQ_DONTPREP;
>>
>> return BLKPREP_OK;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 8:35 [PATCH V4] mmc: Kill block requests if card is removed Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-12-08 9:22 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-12-21 11:06 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma [this message]
2011-12-25 1:58 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF1BDA7.6070903@codeaurora.org \
--to=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.