From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AA5E0123C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2011 08:03:07 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="49434132" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.115]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2011 08:03:07 -0800 Message-ID: <4EF20329.10408@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:02:49 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <1df27b9bdc349f658a19645a4af6f73548203aca.1324456294.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4EF1F39F.7040003@windriver.com> <4EF200CC.4000306@linux.intel.com> <4EF201C4.6030707@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF201C4.6030707@windriver.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto-tiny: New kernel recipe for poky-tiny distro (INCOMPLETE) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:03:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> >> On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>> linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE >>>> branch to standard/tiny. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart >>>> --- ... >>>> +SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta \ >>>> + file://core.cfg \ >>>> + file://serial.cfg \ >>>> + file://ext2.cfg \ >>>> + file://rtc-pc.cfg \ >>>> + file://ramfs.cfg \ >>>> + file://devtmpfs.cfg \ >>>> + file://net.cfg \ >>>> + file://debug.cfg \ >>>> + file://lzma.cfg \ >>>> + " >>> >>> So I assume that the order of these doesn't really matter, and that >>> they are non-overlapping ? The answer must be yes, since you've been >>> testing this, and you don't have a .scc file to control their order :) >>> >> >> That's correct. >> >>> Other than that, it looks pretty good to me. >> >> Great. Did you have a close look at core.cfg? It along with things like >> devtmpfs and ramfs are likely to form the basis of the linux-yocto tiny >> ktype general policy. > > I had a 'medium' depth look :) I didn't see anything outrageous > or shocking. I'll loop back and have a better look later as well. I'm mostly interested in things that are MISSING. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel