From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DFAE0123C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBLG4Vtl029686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:31 -0800 Message-ID: <4EF2038B.9090108@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:04:27 -0500 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <1df27b9bdc349f658a19645a4af6f73548203aca.1324456294.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4EF1F39F.7040003@windriver.com> <4EF200CC.4000306@linux.intel.com> <4EF201C4.6030707@windriver.com> <4EF20329.10408@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF20329.10408@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto-tiny: New kernel recipe for poky-tiny distro (INCOMPLETE) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:04:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11-12-21 11:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>>> linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE >>>>> branch to standard/tiny. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart >>>>> --- > > ... > >>>>> +SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta \ >>>>> + file://core.cfg \ >>>>> + file://serial.cfg \ >>>>> + file://ext2.cfg \ >>>>> + file://rtc-pc.cfg \ >>>>> + file://ramfs.cfg \ >>>>> + file://devtmpfs.cfg \ >>>>> + file://net.cfg \ >>>>> + file://debug.cfg \ >>>>> + file://lzma.cfg \ >>>>> + " >>>> >>>> So I assume that the order of these doesn't really matter, and that >>>> they are non-overlapping ? The answer must be yes, since you've been >>>> testing this, and you don't have a .scc file to control their order :) >>>> >>> >>> That's correct. >>> >>>> Other than that, it looks pretty good to me. >>> >>> Great. Did you have a close look at core.cfg? It along with things like >>> devtmpfs and ramfs are likely to form the basis of the linux-yocto tiny >>> ktype general policy. >> >> I had a 'medium' depth look :) I didn't see anything outrageous >> or shocking. I'll loop back and have a better look later as well. > > I'm mostly interested in things that are MISSING. Aha. That's different. I'll go back and look! Bruce >