From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.kapsi.fi ([217.30.184.167]:45997 "EHLO mail.kapsi.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753195Ab1LVQpp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:45:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4EF35EB5.5010700@iki.fi> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:45:41 +0200 From: Antti Palosaari MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-media , Patrick Boettcher Subject: Re: which is correct name DTMB or CTTB? References: <4EF1ACA3.8080808@iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <4EF1ACA3.8080808@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/21/2011 11:53 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote: > I am adding DTMB/CTTB support for the Linux Kernel DVB API. Do anyone > have clear idea which correct name? > > Background of that discussion can be found from the following patch: > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/8827/ There is already defined delivery system SYS_DMBTH. It have been from the time S2API was introduced coming from the patch: 6b73eeafbc856c0cef7166242f0e55403407f355 include/linux/dvb/frontend.h Should I change that name? Or introduce new names using define? Or just leave it as it is. No single driver is using that because all existing DTMB/CTTB/DMB-TH drivers are abusing DVB-T... I still think it is rather safe to change better one, there is likely no user space apps using that yet... regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/