All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Rishi Panjwani <rpanjwan@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath6kl: Support for TCP checksum offload to firmware
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 03:20:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF528DE.5090407@qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324427136-8183-1-git-send-email-rpanjwan@qca.qualcomm.com>

Hi Rishi,

On 12/21/2011 02:25 AM, Rishi Panjwani wrote:
> The change enables offloading TCP checksum calculation to firmware.
> The support has been added for QA team's testing purposes and currently
> there is no plan to offload the feature to firmware by default at
> load time.

Why? Please document the reason in the commit log.

Also does this comment still apply? It wasn't clear for me from looking
at the code.

> +	ndev->hw_features |= (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM);

No need for parenthesis here.

> @@ -265,6 +267,14 @@ int ath6kl_data_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (test_bit(WMI_ENABLED, &ar->flag)) {
> +		if ((dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM) &&
> +				(csum == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)) {
> +			csum_start = skb->csum_start -
> +					(skb_network_header(skb) - skb->head) +
> +					sizeof(struct ath6kl_llc_snap_hdr);
> +			csum_dest = skb->csum_offset + csum_start;
> +		}

Shouldn't you test dev->features here, not hw_features?

> +
>  		if (skb_headroom(skb) < dev->needed_headroom) {
>  			struct sk_buff *tmp_skb = skb;
>  
> @@ -281,11 +291,31 @@ int ath6kl_data_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  			goto fail_tx;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (ath6kl_wmi_data_hdr_add(ar->wmi, skb, DATA_MSGTYPE,
> -					    more_data, 0, 0, NULL,
> -					    vif->fw_vif_idx)) {
> -			ath6kl_err("wmi_data_hdr_add failed\n");
> -			goto fail_tx;
> +		if ((dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM) &&
> +				(csum == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)) {

Ditto.

> +			meta_v2.csum_start = csum_start;
> +			meta_v2.csum_dest = csum_dest;
> +
> +/*instruct target to calculate checksum*/

Indent similarly as the rest of the code and add spaces like this:

			/* instruct target to calculate checksum */


> +			meta_v2.csum_flags = CSUM_OFFLOAD_FLAG;
> +			ret = ath6kl_wmi_data_hdr_add(ar->wmi, skb,
> +					DATA_MSGTYPE, more_data, 0,
> +					WMI_META_VERSION_2,
> +					&meta_v2, vif->fw_vif_idx);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				ath6kl_warn("failed to add tcp checksum:%d\n"
> +						, ret);
> +				goto fail_tx;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			ret = ath6kl_wmi_data_hdr_add(ar->wmi, skb,
> +						DATA_MSGTYPE, more_data, 0, 0,
> +						NULL, vif->fw_vif_idx);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				ath6kl_warn("failed to add wmi data header:%d\n"
> +						, ret);
> +				goto fail_tx;
> +			}
>  		}

Instead of calling the wmi function twice you could add new variables to
make it look simpler:

if (foo) {
	meta = &meta_v2;
	meta_ver = WMI_META_VERSION_2;
} else {
	meta = NULL;
	meta_ver = 0;
}

ret = ath6kl_wmi_data_hdr_add(ar->wmi, skb,
				DATA_MSGTYPE, more_data, 0,
				meta_ver,
				&meta, vif->fw_vif_idx);


> @@ -1259,6 +1289,27 @@ void ath6kl_rx(struct htc_target *target, struct htc_packet *packet)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +/*Support for configuring rx checksum offload*/

Indent and add spaces.

> +	if ((vif->ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) &&
> +		(ar->rx_meta_ver != WMI_META_VERSION_2)) {
> +		ar->rx_meta_ver = WMI_META_VERSION_2;
> +		if (ath6kl_wmi_set_rx_frame_format_cmd(ar->wmi,
> +			if_idx, ar->rx_meta_ver, 0, 0)) {
> +			ath6kl_err("unable to set the rx frame format\n");
> +			status = -EIO;
> +		}
> +	} else if (!(vif->ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) &&
> +		(ar->rx_meta_ver == WMI_META_VERSION_2)) {
> +		ar->rx_meta_ver = 0;
> +		if (ath6kl_wmi_set_rx_frame_format_cmd(ar->wmi,
> +			if_idx, ar->rx_meta_ver, 0, 0)) {
> +			ath6kl_err("unable to set the rx frame format\n");
> +			status = -EIO;
> +		}
> +
> +	}

I don't like that this in the rx path, which is supposed to be a
hotpath. I think adding ndo_set_features() callback and doing this in
that callback is much better.

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ static inline u8 wmi_data_hdr_get_if_idx(struct wmi_data_hdr *dhdr)
>  #define WMI_META_VERSION_1	0x01
>  #define WMI_META_VERSION_2	0x02
>  
> +/* Flag to signal to FW to calculate TCP checksum */
> +#define CSUM_OFFLOAD_FLAG 0x01

This could be named a bit differently, WMI_META_V2_FLAG_CSUM_OFFLOAD or
something like that.

Kalle

      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-24  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-21  0:25 [PATCH v2] ath6kl: Support for TCP checksum offload to firmware Rishi Panjwani
2011-12-24  1:20 ` Kalle Valo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EF528DE.5090407@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpanjwan@qca.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.