Re: pv guests die after failed migration

[Andreas Olsowski <andreas.olsowski@leuphana.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1441 bytes --]

Has any progress been made regarding this issue?



> On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 11:35 +0100, Andreas Olsowski wrote:
>> On 10/15/2011 07:44 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 02:18 +0100, Andreas Olsowski wrote:
>>>> It seems this still has not made it into 4.1-testing.
>>> I'm afraid I've not had time to "figure out how to automatically select
>>> which guests are capable of a cooperative resume and which are not." so
>>> it hasn't been fixed in xen-unstable either AFAIK.
>>>
>> Wouldnt just assuming all of them do fix a bigger percentage of systems
>> than leaving it the way it is?
> I don't know -- that's really the point.
>
>>> I'm also still interested in confirmation to the question I asked in the
>>> mail you just replied to.
>>>
>> Oh, i thought i allready did.
>>
>>   >  Are you saying that you don't see the "failed for domain %u" message
>>   >  immediately after the xc_domain_resume call?
>>   >
>>   >  +    if (xc_domain_resume(ctx->xch, domid, 1)) {
>>   >             LIBXL__LOG_ERRNO(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR,
>>   >                             "xc_domain_resume failed for domain %u",
>>   >                             domid);
>>   >
>>   >  That would be pretty odd...
>>
>> Yes that is what i am saying:
> Oh wait, that's right -- as far as the toolstack is concerned the resume
> was successful -- the subsequent crash is within the guest.
>
> Ian.
>
Andreas


[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5144 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel