From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43543)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1RgcmR-0001Im-RF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:45:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1RgcmQ-0006Sn-Vq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:45:55 -0500
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:51856)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1RgcmQ-0006SH-KW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:45:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4EFDC03E.5050507@web.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:44:30 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com>
	<4EF73EF5.8050606@redhat.com>	<4EF88EC0.8020301@codemonkey.ws>
	<4EF8FC88.70809@redhat.com>	<4EFA4829.4000207@redhat.com>
	<4EFA80EA.3050405@codemonkey.ws>	<4EFAA2A2.4000107@redhat.com>
	<4EFB2764.7040006@codemonkey.ws>	<4EFB2F36.2090408@redhat.com>
	<4EFB35AB.6040003@redhat.com>	<4EFB4757.4020504@codemonkey.ws>
	<4EFB5138.5020502@redhat.com>	<4EFC916E.4070902@codemonkey.ws>
	<4EFC9706.4090500@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_b2p2d1rq2Jh4rxZe=nUfd1UxpNKo+teQSRTkf1590mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EFCB274.5020102@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4EFCB274.5020102@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] qemu-test: a set of tests scripts for
 QEMU
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "lmr@redhat.com" <lmr@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, cleber@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Am 29.12.2011 19:33, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> I don't think we should focus much on qtest for non-x86 targets.  I
> mean, if you are interested in it for ARM, fantastic, but I don't think
> we would mandate it.

I'm actually very interested in having a qtest framework for non-x86 for

a) unit testing TCG (execute instruction, check register/memory results)
b) unit testing device emulation

Your v2 qtest RFC is still missing the libqtest C implementation. We
code in C so I'd like to test b) in C, not Python or some random other
language that someone happens to like for whatever reason.

Andreas