From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:11:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EFF3419.4050504@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111230144023.371be015@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Le 30/12/2011 23:40, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> The bonding device can cause kernel panic in the enslave error handling.
>
> If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the
> error unwind does not clear the new entry out of the slave list.
> This ends up leaving a reference to freed memory in the bond
> device slave linked list.
>
> The following is a simple example:
> # modprobe dummy
> # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan
> # modprobe bonding
> # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
> # ip -s li show dev bond0
>
> This returns with -EBUSY, but the bonding device has bogus entry in
> the slave list, and will panic on next operation that gets statistics
> from bond0.
>
> The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list)
> in the unwind path.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger<shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
> ---
> Patch is against net-next but should be applied to net (3.2), and
> stable (3.1 and 3.0).
>
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2011-12-30 14:20:03.171823181 -0800
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2011-12-30 14:20:20.232020474 -0800
> @@ -1853,6 +1853,9 @@ err_dest_symlinks:
> bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>
> err_close:
> + write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
> + bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave);
> + write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
> dev_close(slave_dev);
>
> err_unset_master:
NAK.
There are three 'goto err_close' before the call to bond_attach_slave. For those three goto, your
path will call bond_detach_slave without a previous call to bond_attach_slave.
This would at least decrement bond->slave_cnt, without having incremented it before.
Do I miss something ?
Nicolas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-31 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-30 22:40 [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-31 16:11 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-12-31 23:26 ` [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2) Stephen Hemminger
2012-01-01 0:09 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2012-01-01 0:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-01-01 0:28 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2012-01-03 17:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EFF3419.4050504@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.