From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tinyArch.localdomain (unknown [78.110.170.148]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5733FE006DD for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (unknown [195.171.99.130]) by tinyArch.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E6F722D0B for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:18:34 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4F058D02.2050707@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:44:02 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Integrating 3rd Party BSP Layers X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:44:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Good morning everyone, I am currently trying to figure out the best way to integrate the meta-texasinstruments layer with the Yocto provided layers. According to the meta-texasinstruments readme, it requires the meta-oe, meta-angstrom and meta-oe-core. Now Yocto provides the stable meta-oe-core (correct?), so I would clone the meta-oe and meta-angstrom, add them and the meta-texasinstruments layer to my bblayers.conf then build away, yes? However, what implications does adding these new layers bring when using them in the Yocto environment? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated on the consequences and/or my methodology! The main aim of the game is trying to build an image for the beagleboard using the meta-texasinstruments layer as to get the latest and greatest support - with the possibility of using it later in the day when the beaglebones start appearing but with the stability and additional support that is acquired through the Yocto umbrella. Kind Regards, Jack.