All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org,
	pmatouse@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, jbottomley@parallels.com,
	mchristi@redhat.com, msnitzer@redhat.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: fail SCSI passthrough ioctls on partition devices
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:40:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F05D286.7030205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwcZjxZsVV_9rsKgApDfEMdCdHYvkDW5Wz7j-=gd_tFeQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/05/2012 05:16 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Hence, changing scsi_verify_blk_ioctl to return ENOIOCTLCMD is not
>> really possible.
>
> What?
>
> "We have a bug in the block IO layer, so we cannot possible fix
> another problem?"
>
> Whjat the f*ck is the logic there?
>
> Just fix the *obvious* breakage in BLKROSET. It's clearly what the
> code *intends* to do, it just didn't check for ENOIOCTLCMD.

Aha, so this is clear and obvious.  And who knows that something else 
won't break?  Such as the 32-on-64 logic that already uses ENOIOCTLCMD 
for something else?

If the block maintainers want to fix that, fine.  "git blame 
block/ioctl.c" shows that it's been like this for 6 years and in general 
the file has hardly seen changes.  That's enough to make me steer away 
from that code.

Foolish me who found a bug, and an exploitable one for that matter, and 
even tried to fix it.  Looks like security by obscurity would have 
served users better.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-22 18:02 [PATCH 0/3] possible privilege escalation via SG_IO ioctl (CVE-2011-4127) Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add and use scsi_blk_cmd_ioctl Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: fail SCSI passthrough ioctls on partition devices Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 18:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-22 19:11     ` Willy Tarreau
2011-12-22 19:18     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 19:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-22 20:23         ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 20:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-22 22:08             ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-22 22:25               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-22 23:48                 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-12-23  0:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-23  6:26                     ` Willy Tarreau
2011-12-23  9:22                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-23  9:45                         ` Willy Tarreau
2011-12-23 14:15                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-23 22:46                           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 13:18                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-05 16:16                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 16:40                                 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-01-05 17:04                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 17:26                                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-05 23:49                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-26  1:41                       ` Daniel Barkalow
2011-12-23  0:17                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-22 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] dm: do not forward ioctls from logical volumes to the underlying device Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F05D286.7030205@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmatouse@redhat.com \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.