From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John 'Warthog9' Hawley" Subject: Re: where should I report kvm kernel bug? Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:33:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4F065D7D.4080206@kernel.org> References: <1B4B44D9196EFF41AE41FDA404FC0A10F980@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4F02D405.3030809@redhat.com> <1325608111.31426.2.camel@i5.mricon.com> <4F0335FA.4080600@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , "Ren, Yongjie" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , ftpadmin To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:36729 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756482Ab2AFCdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:33:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F0335FA.4080600@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/03/2012 10:08 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/03/2012 06:28 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> I'm surprised bugzilla.kernel.org isn't responding. Copying >>> ftpadmin@kernel.org for ETA (though that address isn't responding, either). >> >> Hi, Avi and Ren: >> >> Unfortunately, we don't currently have an ETA for bringing up >> bugzilla.kernel.org. We are still awaiting some hardware deliveries >> before we can recover that service. > > The KVM developers suggest a virtual machine in the meantime? > >> I suggest you ask KVM developers >> where they would prefer to have the bug reported. > > Ren, please use the qemu bug tracker temporarily, just make sure to mark > it as a kernel bug. > >> Sorry for lack of responses -- the holidays always make it more >> difficult to respond in time. >> > > Thanks. > Ok, I've quietly turned bugzilla back on don't beat it too hard or you'll start affecting other services but it's alive. - John