From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: synchronous register in kvm_run
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:37:17 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0ADF7D.4080209@de.ibm.com>
References: <1325757285-59875-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.108]:45506 "EHLO
	e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754589Ab2AIMiE (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:38:04 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org> from <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>;
	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:38:02 -0000
Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.252])
	by d06nrmr1707.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q09Cbdxl2633792
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:37:39 GMT
Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q09CbcSX010119
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 05:37:39 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1325757285-59875-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 05/01/12 10:54, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Avi, Marcelo,
> 
> here is the latest update of my patch set about guest registers in kvm_run.
> I have added an u64 flag field to make the whole structure extensible
> (and shrinkable).
> For s390 I added the prefix register as read-only and access and general
> purpose as read write.

Any feedback or suggestions on these patches?