From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
namhyung@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: introduce BIO_IN_FLIGHT flag
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:06:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0BC770.1090702@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120109164148.GB21732@google.com>
Hi,
2012-01-10 1:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:57:43AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> I understand your concerns. However, the blktrace cannot get
>> bio->bi_flags info in its current form AFAIK. Doing it will require
>> extending struct blk_io_trace and it'll cause a compatibility issue,
>> I guess.
>
> Umm? Why can't blk_add_trace_bio_complete() look at the flags (or
> whatever other states) to decide to fire off BLK_TA_COMPLETE or not?
> What's the difference? No userland visible change is necessary at
> all. Just make blktrace.c do the right thing. Am I missing
> something?
>
> Thanks.
>
Oh I misunderstood what you said. I was thinking about filtering in pure
userspace, but you meant in-kernel probe side.
Right, we can change the probe to filter BIO_BOUNCED case out. But IMHO
BIO_CLONED is different, since it usually routed to another device as a
separate IO request. I'll cook a patch for the former soon.
Thanks for the comment.
Namhyung Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-27 14:28 [PATCH -block/for-next 0/2] blktrace: bio-based device tracing improvement v3 Namhyung Kim
2011-12-27 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: introduce BIO_IN_FLIGHT flag Namhyung Kim
2012-01-09 1:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-09 2:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-09 16:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-10 5:06 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-01-10 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 14:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: don't export block_bio_complete tracepoint Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0BC770.1090702@lge.com \
--to=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.