From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: What about closing the SocketCAN BerloOS mailing lists...
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:13:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0C5581.5050709@hartkopp.net>
References: <4F0C2026.7070608@grandegger.com> <20120110150706.GC2524@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:18880 "EHLO
	mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752078Ab2AJPNd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-can@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:13:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20120110150706.GC2524@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-can.vger.kernel.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, SocketCAN Core Mailing List <socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de>
Cc: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>

On 10.01.2012 16:07, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:25:26PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think we do not want to support and maintain the SocketCAN maling list
>> any longer, also to avoid ugly cross-posting. It would be nice if we
>> could enable some kind of auto-responder on the BerliOS mailing lists
>> telling people to switch to the linux-can ml. Note sure if that is
>> possible though?
>>
>> What do you think?
> I agree with your opinion.


Me too.

When it's possible to set up an autoresponder, this could be interesting for
Urs to who owns socketcan-users ML.

Regards,
Oliver