From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from VA3EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C03DB6FC9 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:45:29 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail52-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail52-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E673120075 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.239]) by mail52-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD8F24004D for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F0C7928.1020803@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:45:12 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tang Yuantian-B29983 Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add P1024rdb dts support References: <1326098258-32097-1-git-send-email-b29983@freescale.com> <4F0B561A.7060903@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01/09/2012 09:45 PM, Tang Yuantian-B29983 wrote: > >> On 01/09/2012 02:37 AM, b29983@freescale.com wrote: >>> +/include/ "p1024rdb.dtsi" >>> +/include/ "fsl/p1020si-post.dtsi" >> >> Is p1024 100% software-compatible with p1020? >> >> They have different manuals... >> >> -Scott > > P1020rdb has vitesse-7385 switch. I'm talking about the SoC, not the board. > fsl/p1020si-post.dtsi can be used for both boards. What are you basing this on? Has someone looked over both manuals in detail and concluded that every device described is 100% compatible? -Scott